‘Marketing my personality rather than my book is.. blerghhhhh’ – A non-interview with author Emmy Clarke.

[Updated on 03/11/2015]

luch and friends6
Luch & Friends

My 19 year old, Emmy, publishes her first children’s book today. Woo hoo!!!! Luch & Friends flies into the world with no marketing, no press releases, no publisher. Emmy is her own person. Who likes to do things her way, all the way.

We did consider all of the above. Yet, we both knew Emmy needed creative control. Besides, with publishers there’s always the marketing/branding team. The idea of marketing Luch & Friends based on Emmy’s personality, personal life, or social politics, was not one Emmy was interested in. The thought of talking to people about ‘who she is’ was not something that filled Emmy with delight. She decided to go her own way and self-publish.

However, this meant that marketing/branding would be left up to Emmy.

How to do this left us both feeling uncomfortable. Uncomfortable is too soft a word.

Grim. And glum.

Yep, it left us feeling glummed up and grim.

Marketing and branding leaves most writers feeling diminished to a sound-byte. If you like your sound-byte, you’re lucky. If you don’t…well, my heart goes out to you. (Recently, I was described as, ‘that hippy-faerie woman?’ by an actor after my own book came out. I smiled when I was told ‘cos that’s exactly who I am even when I’m writing stage-plays.)

Anyway, the reason we both felt grim was that we’d heard the new adage that ‘the author needs pushed as well as the book.’ It’s like the age of social media has convinced everyone that we all should be celebrities and to be a celebrity we need to be transparent. Sadly, transparency is not the same as authenticity. I mean, we could opt to market Emmy’s book based on two aspects of ‘the author’s journey’ such as:

Author, Emmy Clarke
Author, Emmy Clarke

First: Emmy’s on the autistic spectrum – her book is about empathy, friendship, and love, often traits not credited to people on the spectrum. This could be an opportunity to inspire others on the spectrum to write and/or inform those not on the spectrum to re-think our notions about autistic people’s capacity for empathy.

Second: Emmy’s also agender – at times within Luch & Friends, Emmy subtly uses gender neutral pronouns.This too could be an opportunity to increase awareness of gender neutrality and its use in linguistics, literature, and society. As Emmy says…

‘I’d love it if we got out of the habit of using gendered language towards people we don’t know … you can’t tell someone’s gender just by their appearance after all!’ – Emmy Clarke

Despite these opportunities to inspire and inform, we both felt grimly glum. Plus something else we couldn’t quite pin-point, but that left you feeling like you needed a long hot shower. This something other sat in our bellies like a fat bloat fart urging to be birthed.

‘I am not an autistic author or an agender author. I’m just an author. It feels gross to exploit two tiny bits of who I am to market a story.’ –  Emmy Clarke

luch and friends3

Yup, the fat bloated fart feeling grew into a slimy greasy yukky grim grey glum farty feeling.

What to do? What to do? What to do?

You see, it’s not that Emmy is ashamed of autism nor agenderiness. No. There was something about capitalizing on something she had no choice over… maybe…that made us squirm. We’re just not sure.

When my first book, ‘Awaken your Inner Faerie in 30 days,’ was published, it was clear that my history was relevant. I write self-help. Who I was, and who I’m evolving into, was part of the work. The fact I’d experienced an attempt on my life and sexual violence was part of the story – people buying the book needed to know what I’d lived. It was all about trust.

luch & friends by emmy clarke

For a children’s story book? Surely not the same degree of author scrutiny shouldn’t be irrelevant? Yet, look on any publisher’s website and you’ll see, time and time again, that they think it is relevant. They want authors they can, ‘promote,’ or who can, ‘promote themselves,’ some even say they want authors who already have a ‘personal following.’

Is this what book reader’s demand? Or what publishers/marketers think readers want?

Surely we just buy stories, we don’t buy based on author personality? And if we do, shouldn’t we question that?

As a playwright, I’ve found myself defined as a ‘feminist writer’ because I choose to write pieces for older women. This is right. I am a feminist and I am a writer. Though that’s missing the point. No one really wants to know what kind of feminist I am (intersectional, if you must know) It is clear they just want a sound-byte. A pigeon hole to put me in. Or they are just reaching for something, ANYTHING, to say in order to sell.

Don’t get me wrong. I sympathise. We live in information overload. Never before has so much information been available to so many people at the click of a finger. Never before has our attention-spans been so fragmented. Our minds thirsty for entertainment in a world thickly saturated with the promise of quick speedy distraction.

It bears remembering – None of it’s real.

I know a lot of actors reluctant to discuss themselves as people. They know it ruins their ability to do their job. The job of helping the audience suspend their disbelief – that’s hard to do when your wedding photos are in OK magazine (or the audience is busy reading who you’re having lunch with in Just Jared. *shudder*)

luch and friends1

Do we really want to do this for authors and poets too? Do we need to know who Stephen King votes for, or what brand of toilet paper he uses in order to enjoy Carrie? I personally don’t read the Death Of Myth-Making by Sylvia Plath and think, yeah that’s good, but what shampoo does she use?

I’m all for natural curiosity, but it can interfere with our interpretation of the work. We see less of the story; it becomes contaminated by ego-personality. Our projections and judgements of the author’s sound-byted personality shadow the art – it can become more about the individual creator rather than the created piece. I can’t help feel that the art suffers as a result. That’s why I never like to know too much about the creator behind the creation.

Maybe that’s what lay behind the pent up fart pressure that sat within us both. Maybe it’s simply being an over-protective mamma. Not wanting what I know is inevitable.

luch and friends5

Yes, maybe the slimy farty feeling is a bodily rebellion against my child being condensed into a phrase like… ‘Emmy Clarke, the autistic writer of Luch & Friends,’ or ‘Emmy Clarke? Isn’t she that the agender one who writes about mice for kids?

I mean, it’s inevitable. Half of all communication is short-hand in making ourselves understood.

We just didn’t want to encourage it. So it felt right for Emmy to do a Fleetwood Mac and go her own way. As Emmy said this weekend, ‘the story is the point. Why don’t we just promote the story?’

So, that’s what she’s chosen to do. And in her own words – here’s what Luch & Friends is all about.

‘Luch & Friends is a story about a mouse, Luch, her friends, and the fun they get up to when Luch’s cousin Radan comes to live with her. Radan has a sad secret she’s finding it hard to speak up about, but eventually it comes to light with everyone’s support and love. – Emmy Clarke

Seriously, it’s that simple.

luch and friends2

‘Luch & Friends’ is quaint, gentle, sweet bedtime story for children aged four and upwards. We trust it will find its way, (without noisy branding and aggressive marketing,) into children’s lives. After all, that’s who it was wrote for…and everything in this crazy world has a habit of working out perfectly, each and every time.

If you want to bring Luch & Friends into your child’s life get a copy from…

Luch & Friends on Amazon UK

Luch & Friends on Amazon US

Luch & Friends on Lulu

If you want to enjoy more pretty animal illustrations go to the Luch & Friends Tumblr or to Emmy’s Blog Books and Flowers

Big Love to you All!

© Alex Clarke 2015 – Founder & Editor 

5 comments

  1. Very well done to Emmy for standing at her ground at such a young age and many wishes for a bright career!
    I must say, becoming a coach has made me aware of the competition out there and how fierce some in my field can be! It really opened my eyes, for I started off thinking that this job would be just about supporting others, while I suddenly get thrown into the social media world where people are asked to be their own star, go out there and shine…It feels quite forceful at times and again, trying to keep authentic may leave you at the end of the queue!
    Anyway, I love what you ladies are achieving together, what a magical path you have embarked upon!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I can relate to everything you sat Antonia. It’s almost like you sit in my heart.

    When I started out in the old holistic game I thought it would be about building a community of like-minded people around me, we’d skill share, we’d support each others work, we’d always have the people we are healing/enabling/empowering in mind when sharing news of each others workshops and projects etc etc. I was perhaps naive. Or as my Emmy calls me ‘incurably optimistic’. But I had no idea how afraid people are, even in our field of well-being.

    And I think that’s what it’s about underneath – fear.

    The fierce driven competition, the separation, the determination, the suspicion of kindness, the linear power-housing and alpha-ing, all feels very yang driven. The sense there’s not enough to go round is rife and untrue. (Communities heal people – it takes many to help a person put themselves back together. As a society we have lost sight of that. We are all needed and it’s possible to join the dots between us all.)

    It’s challenging to keep the soft gentle healing yin flowing when the industry pushes (consciously or unconsciously) for us to be different in our approaches. Disillusioned and confused by the mixed messages, it’s easy to get lost along the way. Female alpha-ing hidden under the guise of sisterhood, adverts for ways to improve your ‘message’ and offer ‘more’ to clients…for me, it all gets a little bit to much. I now market myself locally. I may do a blog post on it. I think asking myself —

    Why do I do what I do? And who do I do it for? Has helped me alot over the past year.

    A glorious status update is not enough. Likes? Shares? Pins and re-posts? Who cares. It means nothing – unless the people I’ve been guided to comfort are comforted. And those people are not online. They cannot afford that luxury.

    Another aspects emerges as I write. And that is…Does every aspect of who we ‘think’ we are need to be revealed in order to be judged authentic? Worthy? spiritual? Happy or well? Social media is just another wall of illusion, separating us from the very people we want to engage with. And from the Truth of ourselves. Yet the Earth is craving the real in her belly. Yes…

    Who is this for?
    Which part of the self is being fed by this action?
    Which part of the other person is being transformed?

    They’re simple questions, but ones I repeat, often, when social media is full of that fast paced pushing a shoving. They ground me back into reality.

    PS: Thank you for your kind works Antonia. You are a blessing 🙂

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s